News Detail

Designing cities with and for biodiversity

June 29, 2026 | Simon Koechlin

Green roofs, constructed wetlands and watercourses help protect cities from climate-related hazards. According to an Eawag study, greater attention should be paid to biological aspects when planning this blue-green infrastructure. Systems with higher biodiversity perform better, are more resilient and require less maintenance.

Heatwaves and heavy rainfall are becoming more frequent due to climate change. This has a particularly severe impact on cities. Engineers and local authorities are therefore working to better protect built-up areas from natural hazards. They are increasingly turning to nature-based elements such as permeable surfaces and paving, green roofs or retention ponds. This ‘blue-green infrastructure’ offers advantages over ‘grey’ protective measures such as concrete rainwater basins: permeable surfaces, for example, store rainwater directly in the ground, thereby relieving the strain on sewer systems.

Blue-green infrastructure also provides habitats for plants, animals, fungi and microbes. When properly designed and interconnected, it serves as a crucial element in maintaining and promoting biodiversity in urban areas. “Yet for engineering professionals, the biological aspects of blue-green infrastructure are often still an afterthought,” says Kilian Perrelet. In his doctoral thesis, supervised by Lauren Cook and Florian Altermatt (both at the Eawag Water Research Institute) and Marco Moretti (from the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL), he investigated how biodiversity can be promoted through blue-green infrastructure. Perrelet now works as a postdoctoral researcher at the WSL.

Part of the thesis consisted of a literature review published in the journal *npj Urban Sustainability*. For this, Perrelet compiled studies demonstrating that biodiversity is a key factor in the effectiveness of blue-green infrastructure. “There is evidence, for example, that an increase in plant diversity improves rainwater infiltration, water quality and heat reduction,” says Perrelet. “These improvements are not vast, but they are significant.”

The benefits of diversity

One important effect is that different species can utilise resources in a complementary way. Infrastructure with varied foliage or root systems can therefore absorb more heat or retain and purify water more effectively. “Generally speaking, the greater the morphological differences between species, the greater the benefits,” says Kilian Perrelet. Evidence from the field has also shown that ecological functionality improves when humans do not interfere too intensively with the vegetation. “This could be because it allows species to establish themselves that use resources differently in order to avoid competition,” says Perrelet. But other factors could play a role as well, namely the greater number of species in unmanaged sites relative to heavily manicured ones.

Biodiverse infrastructure elements are not only more efficient but also more resilient. They typically comprise several species that fulfil the same function but respond differently to disturbances. This makes systems less vulnerable to droughts, floods or pest infestations. Studies on this topic in the field of blue-green infrastructure are still relatively rare. “But the existing ones confirm this pattern,” says Perrelet.

Ultimately, biodiversity can also reduce maintenance costs. In parks or gardens with a wide diversity of flowers, for example, there are more natural enemies of pests, reducing the need for pesticides. On green roofs, meanwhile, studies have shown that stonecrop species alter the microclimate, thereby protecting other plants from drying out. “This reduces the effort required for watering or reseeding,” says Perrelet.
 

Planning for biodiversity

In addition to these technical benefits, biodiversity in urban areas has further advantages. “People value diverse green spaces, they tend to prefer some degree of perceived naturalness,” says Perrelet. This can promote mental health and, potentially, help prevent cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, functioning ecosystems provide raw materials, ensure fertile soil and facilitate the pollination of crops. “Apart from that, it is also our moral duty to take action against the drastic decline of many species,” says Perrelet. There are therefore many reasons to plan and design blue-green infrastructure not just in tandem with biodiversity, but also for its benefit.

Biodiverse blue-green infrastructure is capable of fulfilling both engineering and ecological functions simultaneously. However, according to the researchers, compromises are sometimes necessary – for example, when promoting biodiversity conflicts with public safety. In a retention pond in the middle of a residential area, mosquitoes that transmit diseases must be controlled. One option is to usex a circulation pump to keep the water flowing. Different functions of blue-green infrastructure can also conflict with one another: for flood protection, for instance, a porous soil is desirable, to allow water to seep away quickly. For heat protection, on the other hand, the soil should remain moist so that it contributes to cooling through evaporation.

Broad cooperation needed

According to Perrelet, for blue-green infrastructure to protect people from natural hazards in the future and provide a network of habitats that is as ecologically valuable as possible, there needs to be, on the one hand, a societal will for change. “People naturally tend to want to keep the status quo,” says the researcher. “For a property management company, it is often easier to maintain a green space in the same way it always has. After all, a resident might react negatively if part of a lawn is converted into a meadow.”

On the other hand, interdisciplinary teamwork and partnerships are essential. Planning and designing a single green roof is relatively straightforward. However, blue-green infrastructure truly becomes ecologically valuable when it is strategically interconnected. It is therefore important to take into account the ecological needs of biological communities not only locally, but also on a broader regional or landscape scale.

“This overarching perspective is still largely missing in practice,” says Perrelet. Assessing these connections is particularly challenging. “This requires specialist knowledge – and everyone involved must be convinced of the need to look at the bigger picture.” Broad collaboration is therefore necessary to make cities more biodiverse and resilient to climate change. It is not only engineers and biologists who must work together; urban planners, architects, economists, social scientists and experts from other disciplines must also be involved.

Blue-green infrastructure

Blue-green infrastructure (BGI) is an integrated, nature-based approach to urban planning. The concept combines the natural water cycle (water bodies, infiltration areas) with green elements such as green spaces, green roofs and trees, in order to manage water sustainably and promote biodiversity. In contrast to traditional, grey infrastructure (concrete channels and pipes), BGI utilises natural processes to absorb, store and filter rainwater. This reduces the risk of flooding, improves water quality and, at the same time, cools the city. Researchers at Eawag are conducting interdisciplinary projects to investigate how effective blue-green infrastructure can make our cities more climate-resilient and liveable.

Cover picture: Green roofs, like the one on the Ethnographic Museum in Budapest, are havens of biodiversity and contribute positively to the urban climate. (Photo: Kilian Perrelet)

Original publication

Extbase Variable Dump
array(3 items)
   publications => '32825' (5 chars)
   libraryUrl => '' (0 chars)
   layout => '0' (1 chars)
Extbase Variable Dump
array(1 item)
   0 => Snowflake\Publications\Domain\Model\Publicationprototypepersistent entity (uid=32825, pid=124)
      originalId => protected32825 (integer)
      authors => protected'Perrelet, K.; Moretti, M.; Dietzel, A.; Altermatt, F.; C
         ook, L. M.
' (96 chars) title => protected'Engineering blue-green infrastructure for and with biodiversity in cities' (73 chars) journal => protected'npj Urban Sustainability' (24 chars) year => protected2024 (integer) volume => protected4 (integer) issue => protected'1' (1 chars) startpage => protected'27 (11 pp.)' (11 chars) otherpage => protected'' (0 chars) categories => protected'' (0 chars) description => protected'Blue-green infrastructure (BGI), combining semi-natural and engineered eleme
         nts, offers multifaceted benefits like stormwater management, water purifica
         tion, heat mitigation, and habitat provision. However, current BGI designs p
         rioritize engineering goals, overlooking its ecological potential. Here we a
         dvocate for integrating engineering and ecological objectives into BGI desig
         n to enhance performance and biodiversity. Through an interdisciplinary lite
         rature review, we emphasize the importance of species diversity, abundance,
         and ecological processes, to improve engineering performance and resilience,
          and lower management costs. We emphasize the importance of interdisciplinar
         y collaboration to navigate trade-offs between engineering and ecological ob
         jectives, ultimately enabling us to engineer both for and with biodiversity.
' (836 chars) serialnumber => protected'' (0 chars) doi => protected'10.1038/s42949-024-00163-y' (26 chars) uid => protected32825 (integer) _localizedUid => protected32825 (integer)modified _languageUid => protectedNULL _versionedUid => protected32825 (integer)modified pid => protected124 (integer)
Perrelet, K.; Moretti, M.; Dietzel, A.; Altermatt, F.; Cook, L. M. (2024) Engineering blue-green infrastructure for and with biodiversity in cities, npj Urban Sustainability, 4(1), 27 (11 pp.), doi:10.1038/s42949-024-00163-y, Institutional Repository