News Detail

back
A restored reach of the Emme in the Bernese Oberland (Photo: Markus Bolliger, Shutterstock)

Targeting restoration measures to maximise ecological benefits

February 8, 2019 | Stephanie Schnydrig

In the coming decades, many rivers in Switzerland are to be restored to a natural state. To identify those river reaches where restoration would be ecologically most valuable, Eawag scientists have developed a new assessment procedure.

Today, very few Swiss rivers or streams still flow in a natural bed. Since the eighteenth century, around 15,000 kilometres of watercourses have been modified, engineered or channelised. The degradation of aquatic habitats has had a severe impact on biodiversity. To tackle this problem, the federal government has requested the cantons to restore around 4,000 kilometres of rivers and streams by 2090.

But what criteria should be used to select the river reaches to be restored? To help answer this question, scientists in Eawag’s Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling (SIAM) department have developed a new assessment procedure to evaluate the outcomes of different restoration strategies. “This allows you to determine where restoration would be particularly worthwhile for the ecosystem as a whole,” says ecological modelling expert Nele Schuwirth, who developed the procedure together with Peter Reichert and Mathias Kuemmerlen. “Our method also makes it possible to identify deficits in the current ecological state and to evaluate future development scenarios.”

Integrated assessment

The new procedure starts by integrating existing physical, chemical and biological assessments at the reach-scale. It is then determined how individual river reaches influence the state of the entire catchment – based on the following five spatial criteria:

  • good ecological state
  • near-natural fish migration potential connectivity
  • resilience-supporting habitats (availability of refugia)
  • low network fragmentation (potential for dispersal)
  • near-natural habitat diversity

The new assessment procedure is designed not only to maximise the ecological benefits of restoration projects but also to support policymakers. As well as facilitating the coordination of various measures, it should enable synergies and conflicts with other important ecological services (e.g. flood protection and drinking water abstraction) to be taken into consideration in decision-making processes. According to Nele Schuwirth, “Transparent processes of this kind are essential for public acceptance.” The proposed method is now to be further refined in consultation with representatives of cantonal authorities.

This study was carried out as part of the EU-funded AQUACROSS project, which aims to support European efforts to protect biodiversity in Europe’s lakes, rivers, coasts and oceans.

Original publication

Ecological assessment of river networks: from reach to catchment scale

Freshwater ecosystems are increasingly under threat as they are confronted with multiple anthropogenic impairments. This calls for comprehensive management strategies to counteract, or even prevent, long-term impacts on habitats and their biodiversity, as well as on their ecological functions and services. The basis for the efficient management and effective conservation of any ecosystem is sufficient knowledge on the state of the system and its response to external influence factors. In freshwater ecosystems, state information is currently drawn from ecological assessments at the reach or site scale. While these assessments are essential, they are not sufficient to assess the expected outcome of different river restoration strategies, because they do not account for important characteristics of the whole river network, such as habitat connectivity or headwater reachability. This is of particular importance for the spatial prioritization of restoration measures. River restoration could be supported best by integrative catchment-scale ecological assessments that are sensitive to the spatial arrangement of river reaches and barriers. Assessments at this scale are of increasing interest to environmental managers and conservation practitioners to prioritize restoration measures or to locate areas worth protecting. We present an approach based on decision support methods that integrates abiotic and biotic ecological assessments at the reach-scale and aggregates them spatially to describe the ecological state of entire catchments. This aggregation is based on spatial criteria that represent important ecological catchment properties, such as fish migration potential, resilience, fragmentation and habitat diversity in a spatially explicit way.We identify the most promising assessment criteria from different alternatives based on theoretical considerations and a comparison with biological indicators. Potential applications are discussed, particularly for supporting the strategic, long-term planning and spatial prioritization of restoration measures.
Kuemmerlen, M.; Reichert, P.; Siber, R.; Schuwirth, N. (2019) Ecological assessment of river networks: from reach to catchment scale, Science of the Total Environment, 650, 1613-1627, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.019, Institutional Repository

Links

  • Activate Socialmedia Buttons
    After activating the social media buttons, data might be transmitted to the networks.