Eawag
Überlandstrasse 133
P.O.Box 611
8600 Dübendorf
Switzerland

Ph. +41 (0)58 765 55 11
Fax +41 (0)58 765 50 28
info@eawag.ch
Research » SWW » Research » Infrastructures » Wastewater Infrastructure Systems DecisiOn Matrix (WISDOM)
Eawag - Aquatic Research
  Home Contact Search DE | EN | FR
 
Urban Water Management
Wastewater Infrastructure Systems DecisiOn Matrix (WISDOM)

Wastewater Infrastructure Systems DecisiOn Matrix (WISDOM)

WISDOM: Choosing the appropriate sanitation system

The WISDOM (Wastewater Infrastructure Systems DecisiOn Matrix) project aims at developing a methodology to deal with the sanitation system (SanSys) alternative selection problem.

The SanSys alternative selection problem is a complex multiple criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problem involving a large number of potential solutions, diverse conflicting criteria and different actors such as the different authorities in relation to sanitation issues and the SanSys users.

The main characteristics of the proposed multiple criteria group decision making (MCGDM) approach can be summarized with:

  • Since the different decision makers see the problem from different perspectives and have different interests, it is assumed that each decision maker considers his own set of criteria which may or may not overlap with the sets of criteria considered by the other decision makers;

  • The set of appropriate SanSys alternatives is obtained in 3 steps:

    1. Determination of potential SanSys alternatives: The definition of SanSys alternative allows the generation of the all possible and impossible SanSys alternatives. A newly developed compatibility assessment procedure is then applied to determine the potential (technical possible) SanSys alternatives. This procedure allows to identify the technical operable alternatives and to discharge the inoperable systems.

    2. The compatibility assessment is based on the compatibility matrix establishing the compatibility relationships between the different SanSys options.

    3. The application of the feasibility assessment procedure allows to identify feasible SanSys alternatives among potential SanSys alternatives after eliminating infeasible SanSys alternatives. The feasibility assessment is based on a set of attributes representing the main characteristics of the SanSys application case.
  • The sustainability of SanSys alternatives is accounted for through the consideration of criteria from the economic, environmental, social, technical, and institutional dimensions. A generic criteria list based on the literature and expert interviews was developed for WISDOM. In a MCGDM procedure the follwing steps need to be performed: (i) selection of relevant criteria for a specific application case, and (ii) the weighting of selected criteria.

  • The evaluation of SanSys alternatives involves 2 main issues: (i) handling of the different types of data imperfection: incompleteness, uncertainty, imprecision and subjectivity, and (ii) choice of an appropriate evaluating methodology such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), and Open Wastewater Planning (OWP).

  • The individual preferences of each decision maker are obtained through the application of a multiple criteria decision aid (MCDA) method.


The MCGDM WISDOM approach applies mainly to settlements where no SanSys infrastructure exists yet.

It can be adapted to applications considering the extension or upgrading of existing SanSys infrastructure provided that the necessary modifications such as the consideration of the compatibility of the new SanSys options with the existing sanitation infrastructure are considered.

Related links

For more details about the WISDOM project:

  • Poster AG annual meeting 2009 [pdf]
  • Compendium of Sanitation Systems and Technologies (Tilley et al., 2008) [pdf]


Publications

Bufardi, A., Maurer, M., Tilley, E., Truffer, B., Zurbrügg, C., A multiple criteria group decision making framework for the sanitation system alternative selection problem, Submitted.

Bufardi, A., Maurer, M., Tilley, E., Truffer, B., Zurbrügg, C., Compatibility assessment procedure for generating potential sanitation system alternatives, Submitted.

Bufardi, A., Maurer, M., Tilley, E., Truffer, B., Zurbrügg, C., Feasibility assessment procedure for generating appropriate sanitation system alternatives, Submitted.

Bufardi, A., Maurer, M., Tilley, E., Truffer, B., Zurbrügg, C., A multicriteria evaluation approach for sanitation system alternatives, Submitted.

Contact

Contact

Max Maurer


Persons involved:
Ahmed Bufardi
Bernhard Truffer (Cirus, Eawag)
Christian Zurbrügg (Sandec, Eawag)
Elisabeth Tilley (Sandec, Eawag)