The spatial requirements for surface waters specified in the Waters Protection Act represent the absolute minimum required to safeguard their ecological functions. The space provided along small streams is of particular importance, as material flows between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems are not dependent on the width of the watercourse. This is shown by Eawag’s own investigations – and by a review of available studies, which was cited by the Federal Supreme Court in a recent ruling.
A recent publication by Florian Altermatt, a research group leader at Eawag and Professor of Aquatic Ecology at the University of Zurich, began as an address to a gathering of legal experts. The presentation was given to around 350 delegates at the Annual Conference of the Swiss Environmental Law Association (VUR) held in November 2019. As well as summarising his own research findings, Altermatt compared numerous studies carried out around the world on the ecological function of the space provided for surface waters. He focused in particular on the question of how wide this space needs to be so that the waters’ “natural functions” are safeguarded – as required by Switzerland’s Waters Protection Act (Art. 36a, WPA).
Wide variety of ecological functions
The ecological functions of the space provided for surface waters encompass its importance:
- as a habitat (i.e. protection of biodiversity);
- in connecting material flows between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, and serving as a buffer against inputs of pollutants;
- as a wildlife corridor.
All of these functions are more effectively fulfilled by larger spaces with greater connectivity. In the case of small or very small streams, the space provided is of major importance for aquatic-terrestrial flows. For larger watercourses, it is particularly important in creating habitats, enabling geomorphological dynamics and ensuring flood protection. The recreational function of such spaces was not specifically studied.
Legally prescribed minimum width: absolute minimum required
Altermatt’s review, now published in the journal Umweltrecht in der Praxis, shows that, from an ecological perspective, the minimum width of the space to be provided in accordance with the legislation (based on the natural channel bed width and known as the “key chart”) is to be considered as the absolute minimum required to safeguard natural functions. More specifically, given the importance of this space as a habitat, as a buffer against inputs of pesticides and nutrients, and as a regulator of water temperature, substantially wider spaces would be needed in some cases.
Umweltrecht in der Praxis (1/2020): Die ökologische Funktion der Gewässerräume [open access; pdf]