Surfaces which are frequently touched by many different people may be contaminated with the coronavirus, but the risk of infection via this route is low. However, regular collection of samples from door handles, buttons or keypads could be useful for monitoring the course of the pandemic.
Have you ever tried pressing the button at a pedestrian crossing with your elbow? Tricky, isn’t it? Two studies co-authored by Eawag scientists have now shown that we should not be too concerned about contracting the novel coronavirus from buttons or keypads – at least compared to other possible transmission routes.
Eight per cent of samples positive
In the first study, between April and June 2020, almost 350 surface samples were collected from business-entrance door handles, dustbin handles, ATM keypads, petrol pumps – and traffic-light buttons. Of these samples, 29 (approx. 8 %) were positive for genetic material from the coronavirus. However, the concentrations were so low that the risk of infection from touching a contaminated surface was also estimated to be low – “less than 5 in 10,000”, according to Timothy Julian of Eawag’s Environmental Microbiology department. The study – carried out in Somerville (a suburb of Boston, Massachusetts, with a population of around 80,000) – was led by PhD student Abigail Harvey and Professor Amy Pickering of Tufts University.
Sampling: an early warning system
Despite the reassuring news that high-touch surfaces probably play a minimal role in coronavirus community transmission, the scientists suggest that sampling should be regularly performed: the surfaces were touched by different people up to 30 times an hour, and there was good agreement between the positivity rate of surface samples and the trend in new cases of infection detected by clinical testing. Timothy Julian concludes: “As with wastewater sampling, surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA on high-touch surfaces could be a useful tool – in addition to clinical tests – for providing early warning of COVID-19 case trends.”
Handwashing – the best strategy
In the second study, led by Ana Karina Pitol of Imperial College, London, risk assessment models were used to evaluate the effectiveness of surface and hand disinfection in reducing the risk of transmission via contaminated surfaces. The results are unequivocal: while the effectiveness of surface disinfection is dependent on numerous factors and is relatively limited, hand disinfection substantially reduces the risks of infection. Under certain conditions, however, the risks of transmission via buttons, keypads or handles may become non-negligible. As Timothy Julian emphasises, “Taking into account the dozens of objects contacted every hour, a person’s risk of infection will of course increase if a lot of people are carrying the virus – although the risk from other transmission routes would then also increase, particularly if social distancing is not observed, or in crowded spaces.”
Not comparable to dishes or tables
Not included in these studies were surfaces which people may contaminate over longer periods, such as dishes or tables in restaurants. Timothy Julian says: “The likelihood that someone will cough or sneeze over a table, and that droplets with high viral loads will be found there, is much greater than in the case of a button or a door handle – so it remains very important that tables are disinfected and dishes properly washed.”
Abigail P. Harvey et al.: Longitudinal Monitoring of SARS-CoV‑2 RNA on High-Touch Surfaces in a Community Setting; Environmental Science and Technology Letters,
Ana K. Pitol and Timothy R. Julian: Community Transmission of SARS-CoV‑2 by Surfaces: Risks and Risk Reduction Strategies; Environmental Science and Technology Letters, https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00966