Department Environmental Social Sciences

Overlapping Subsystems: Identification and Integration of Fragmented Games in Swiss Water Politics

With the increasing complexity of modern political problems, actors are involved in an ecology of games and simultaneously deal with several issues at different stages and levels, and across varying arenas. We argue that traditional approaches focusing on single policy sectors are unable to deal with this new complexity in political decision-making. In the planned research project, we seek to overcome the limitations of these approaches by focusing explicitly on the games that actors play across issues, stages, levels and arenas. We ask, (1) how can overlapping games be identified; (2) what factors explain that actors or issues are involved in several games; and (3) how do the games that actors play interact with each other?

Empirically, the research project deals with Swiss water politics. Water-related issues are often transboundary and cross-sectoral in nature and involve different levels of decision-making. This complexity makes water politics an ideal case in which to study overlapping games. Our analysis will lead us to (1) map Swiss water politics and its ecology of games; (2) explain the ecology of games by analyzing why actors or issues are involved in several games; and (3) contribute to theory by developing a typology of games.

Project Team

Prof. Dr. Karin Ingold Group Leader, Group: PEGO Tel. +41 58 765 5676 Send Mail
Dr. Manuel Fischer Department Head & Group Leader, Group: PEGO Tel. +41 58 765 5676 Send Mail

External team members

Dr. Philip Leifeld (University of Glasgow)

Publications

Extbase Variable Dump
array(2 items)
   publications => '8199' (4 chars)
   libraryUrl => '' (0 chars)
Extbase Variable Dump
array(1 item)
   0 => Snowflake\Publications\Domain\Model\Publicationprototypepersistent entity (uid=8199, pid=124)
      originalId => protected8199 (integer)
      authors => protected'Fischer, M.; Leifeld, P.' (34 chars)
      title => protected'Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for?' (60 chars)
      journal => protected'Policy Sciences' (15 chars)
      year => protected2015 (integer)
      volume => protected48 (integer)
      issue => protected'3' (1 chars)
      startpage => protected'363' (3 chars)
      otherpage => protected'382' (3 chars)
      categories => protected'policy forum; governance; exchange theory; intermediary organization' (68 chars)
      description => protected'Policy forums are issue-based intermediary organizations where diverse types
          of political and societal actors repeatedly interact. Policy forums are imp
         ortant elements of modern governance systems as they allow actors to learn, 
         negotiate, or build trust. They can vary in composition, size, membership lo
         gic, and other distinct features. This article lays the foundation of a theo
         ry of policy forums based on three interrelated elements: First, it discusse
         s conditions for the formation of a forum and describes the logic of these o
         rganizations as one of an asymmetric multipartite exchange. Second, it enume
         rates the potential set of goals and motivations of participating actors tha
         t are fed into this exchange. Third, it proposes eight different dimensions 
         on which policy forums differ and which affect the exchange mechanisms among
          actors. We claim that empirical work on policy forums should systematically
          take these elements into account and propose elements of a research agenda.' (988 chars)
      serialnumber => protected'0032-2687' (9 chars)
      doi => protected'10.1007/s11077-015-9224-y' (25 chars)
      uid => protected8199 (integer)
      _localizedUid => protected8199 (integer)modified
      _languageUid => protectedNULL
      _versionedUid => protected8199 (integer)modified
      pid => protected124 (integer)

Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for?

Policy forums are issue-based intermediary organizations where diverse types of political and societal actors repeatedly interact. Policy forums are important elements of modern governance systems as they allow actors to learn, negotiate, or build trust. They can vary in composition, size, membership logic, and other distinct features. This article lays the foundation of a theory of policy forums based on three interrelated elements: First, it discusses conditions for the formation of a forum and describes the logic of these organizations as one of an asymmetric multipartite exchange. Second, it enumerates the potential set of goals and motivations of participating actors that are fed into this exchange. Third, it proposes eight different dimensions on which policy forums differ and which affect the exchange mechanisms among actors. We claim that empirical work on policy forums should systematically take these elements into account and propose elements of a research agenda.
Fischer, M.; Leifeld, P. (2015) Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for?, Policy Sciences, 48(3), 363-382, doi:10.1007/s11077-015-9224-y, Institutional Repository