Department Environmental Social Sciences

Industry dynamics and sectoral transformations towards sustainable utility services

The key competency of the research group is the analysis of spatial dimensions in transition processes, with the aim to understand how transitions unfold differently across different geographical contexts. The group focusses on analyzing the complex sectoral changes in emerging industries of sustainable technologies. In the analysis of innovation processes that influence industry dynamics, we use a “socio-technical systems” perspective, which is the interplay among different kinds of actors (firms, academia, end users, policy makers, associations, civil society groups etc.), networks and institutional structures.

The group mostly works with the theoretical concepts of socio-technical regimes and technological innovation systems in order to analyze sectoral transformations and emerging industry dynamics. Empirical cases encompass urban water management, electricity and transport. Geographically the group has worked on projects in Europe, Australia, the US, China, South Africa, Kenya and Malaysia. The results inform innovation policy and management. Methodologically, the group has strong competencies in interview campaigns, discourse analysis, discourse network analysis, strategic foresight, discursive scenario methods, and technology road mapping.

Main focus areas

Sustainability transitions of infrastructure sectors in high-income countries

  • Analyzing conditions to support the success of radical innovations
  • Analyzing early industry formation processes
  • Analyzing institutional conditions, which sustain or hinder large-scale transition processes
  • For example: how can decentralized water treatment systems become a widely accepted alternative in urban water management in Europe

Industry formation and transformation in catch-up countries

  • Technological leapfrogging and catch-up in clean-tech industries
  • The role of spatial relationships and global value chains in explaining success of failure of early industry formation processes
  • For example: understanding changes in the Chinese urban water management sector, shifts to membrane bioreactor technology

Sustainability transitions in urban informal settlements in low-income countries

How can we understand transition processes in informal settlements, a context characterized with widespread poverty, social inequality, heterogeneous and fragmented public service provision, informal economies, and unreliable formal institutions? Research in this domain focuses specifically on urban renewal and basic service innovations in cities in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Team

Group Leader

Prof. Dr. Bernhard Truffer Group leader, Group Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 5670 Send Mail

Team

Teaching

Bernhard Truffer is a full professor at Utrecht University, where he is involved in various courses and where he supervises master and PhD students

Key Publications

Yap X.-S., Truffer B. 2018. Shaping Selection Environments for Industrial Catch-up and Sustainability Transitions. A systemic perspective on endogenizing windows of opportunity. Research Policy.

van Welie M. J., Cherunya P.C., Murphy J., Truffer B. 2018. Splintered regimes in developing cities: the case of sanitation in the squatter settlements of Nairobi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Extbase Variable Dump
array(2 items)
   publications => '19244,14106,14249,14514,8226,7477,6906,6852,6934,6210' (53 chars)
   libraryUrl => '' (0 chars)
Extbase Variable Dump
array(10 items)
   0 => Snowflake\Publications\Domain\Model\Publicationprototypepersistent entity (uid=19244, pid=124)
      originalId => protected19244 (integer)
      authors => protected'Cherunya, P. C.; Ahlborg, H.; Truffer, B.' (61 chars)
      title => protected'Anchoring innovations in oscillating domestic spaces: why sanitation service
          offerings fail in informal settlements
' (115 chars) journal => protected'Research Policy' (15 chars) year => protected2020 (integer) volume => protected49 (integer) issue => protected'1' (1 chars) startpage => protected'103841 (16 pp.)' (15 chars) otherpage => protected'' (0 chars) categories => protected'practice theory; socio-technical transitions; oscillating domestic spaces; s
         anitation; Global South
' (99 chars) description => protected'A persistent conundrum for practitioners and researchers in the development
         context is that, often, newly provided and improved basic services are not m
         aintained by users despite seemingly superior functionality and user conveni
         ence. We argue that one major reason for this is an insufficient understandi
         ng of the context in which users have to manage their daily lives. We theref
         ore propose an approach to analysing the embedding of basic services that fo
         cuses on the users' daily practices. We do so by borrowing insights from 'so
         cio-technical transitions' and 'practice theory' in developing our concept o
         f <em>oscillating domestic spaces.</em> The concept reflects the need for pe
         ople to constantly respond to quickly changing and precarious circumstances
         by rearranging their daily practices in time and space and developing a mult
         iplicity of alternative options and partial solutions<em>.</em> We illustrat
         e the analytical approach in a case study of sanitation access in informal s
         ettlements of Nairobi, Kenya. The analysis shows how the introduction of a c
         ontainer-based toilet resulted in partial embedding. The innovation anchored
          to only a part of the oscillating domestic spaces and was in disarray with
         the needs of users most of the time. The conceptual approach contributes to
         the understanding about how users take part in sustainability transitions as
          well as the added value of the time-space dimension in analysing practices
         in highly complex contexts. We conclude by reflecting on the potential appli
         cability of the analytical approach to transition cases in the Global North.
' (1596 chars) serialnumber => protected'0048-7333' (9 chars) doi => protected'10.1016/j.respol.2019.103841' (28 chars) uid => protected19244 (integer) _localizedUid => protected19244 (integer)modified _languageUid => protectedNULL _versionedUid => protected19244 (integer)modified pid => protected124 (integer)
1 => Snowflake\Publications\Domain\Model\Publicationprototypepersistent entity (uid=14106, pid=124) originalId => protected14106 (integer) authors => protected'Boschma,&nbsp;R.; Coenen,&nbsp;L.; Frenken,&nbsp;K.; Truffer,&nbsp;B.' (69 chars) title => protected'Towards a theory of regional diversification: combining insights from evolut
         ionary economic geography and transition studies
' (124 chars) journal => protected'Regional Studies' (16 chars) year => protected2017 (integer) volume => protected51 (integer) issue => protected'1' (1 chars) startpage => protected'31' (2 chars) otherpage => protected'45' (2 chars) categories => protected'evolutionary economic geography; transition studies; regional diversificatio
         n; unrelated diversification; institutional entrepreneurship; institutional
         change
' (158 chars) description => protected'Towards a theory of regional diversification: combining insights from Evolut
         ionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies. <I>Regional Studies</I>. T
         his paper develops a theoretical framework of regional diversification by co
         mbining insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies
         . It argues that a theory of regional diversification should not only build
         on the current understanding of related diversification but also account for
          processes of unrelated diversification by looking at the role of agency in
         processes of institutional entrepreneurship, and at enabling and constrainin
         g factors at various spatial scales. This paper proposes a typology of four
         regional diversification trajectories by cross-tabulating related versus unr
         elated diversification with niche creation versus regime adoption, and it de
         velops a number of propositions.
' (868 chars) serialnumber => protected'0034-3404' (9 chars) doi => protected'10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460' (29 chars) uid => protected14106 (integer) _localizedUid => protected14106 (integer)modified _languageUid => protectedNULL _versionedUid => protected14106 (integer)modified pid => protected124 (integer)
2 => Snowflake\Publications\Domain\Model\Publicationprototypepersistent entity (uid=14249, pid=124) originalId => protected14249 (integer) authors => protected'Weber,&nbsp;K.&nbsp;M.; Truffer,&nbsp;B.' (40 chars) title => protected'Moving innovation systems research to the next level: towards an integrative
          agenda
' (83 chars) journal => protected'Oxford Review of Economic Policy' (32 chars) year => protected2017 (integer) volume => protected33 (integer) issue => protected'1' (1 chars) startpage => protected'101' (3 chars) otherpage => protected'121' (3 chars) categories => protected'innovation systems; innovation policy; research agenda' (54 chars) description => protected'The concept of innovation systems has been a guiding paradigm of innovation
         research and strongly influenced research and innovation policy since the ea
         rly 1990s. In spite of this success, criticisms have been raised in recent y
         ears about whether it is still a suitable framework for addressing the innov
         ation-related challenges of the future. In the present paper we claim that s
         ystemic explanations of innovation success have still a very important role
         to play. In order to address the rising criticism, however, we have to recon
         sider the conceptual core of the family of innovation systems (IS) approache
         s and sketch out a path for renewal. The paper retraces the conceptual roots
          of IS approaches, assesses their uptake in different policy circles around
         the world, discusses the conceptual core and explanatory ambition, and final
         ly formulates a future-oriented research agenda for a more integrative innov
         ation systems framework.
' (936 chars) serialnumber => protected'0266-903X' (9 chars) doi => protected'10.1093/oxrep/grx002' (20 chars) uid => protected14249 (integer) _localizedUid => protected14249 (integer)modified _languageUid => protectedNULL _versionedUid => protected14249 (integer)modified pid => protected124 (integer)
3 => Snowflake\Publications\Domain\Model\Publicationprototypepersistent entity (uid=14514, pid=124) originalId => protected14514 (integer) authors => protected'Binz,&nbsp;C.; Truffer,&nbsp;B.' (31 chars) title => protected'Global innovation systems - a conceptual framework for innovation dynamics i
         n transnational contexts
' (100 chars) journal => protected'Research Policy' (15 chars) year => protected2017 (integer) volume => protected46 (integer) issue => protected'7' (1 chars) startpage => protected'1284' (4 chars) otherpage => protected'1298' (4 chars) categories => protected'innovation system; globalization; clean-tech industry; industry typology; in
         novation policy
' (91 chars) description => protected'This paper proposes a framework for the analysis of technological innovation
          processes in transnational contexts. By drawing on existing innovation syst
         em concepts and recent elaborations on the globalization of innovation, we d
         evelop a multi-scalar conceptualization of innovation systems. Two key mecha
         nisms are introduced and elaborated: the generation of resources in multi-lo
         cational subsystems and the establishment of structural couplings among them
          in a global innovation system (GIS). Based on this conceptualization, we in
         troduce a typology of four generic GIS configurations, building on the innov
         ation mode and valuation system in different industry types. The analytical
         framework is illustrated with insights from four emerging clean-tech industr
         ies. We state that a comprehensive GIS perspective is instrumental for devel
         oping a more explanatory stance in the innovation system literature and deve
         loping policy interventions that reflect the increasing spatial complexity i
         n the innovation process.
' (1013 chars) serialnumber => protected'0048-7333' (9 chars) doi => protected'10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012' (28 chars) uid => protected14514 (integer) _localizedUid => protected14514 (integer)modified _languageUid => protectedNULL _versionedUid => protected14514 (integer)modified pid => protected124 (integer)
4 => Snowflake\Publications\Domain\Model\Publicationprototypepersistent entity (uid=8226, pid=124) originalId => protected8226 (integer) authors => protected'Truffer,&nbsp;B.; Murphy,&nbsp;J.&nbsp;T.; Raven,&nbsp;R.' (57 chars) title => protected'The geography of sustainability transitions: contours of an emerging theme' (74 chars) journal => protected'Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions' (49 chars) year => protected2015 (integer) volume => protected17 (integer) issue => protected'' (0 chars) startpage => protected'63' (2 chars) otherpage => protected'72' (2 chars) categories => protected'geography of transitions; space; place; scale; power' (52 chars) description => protected'Transition research has recently been criticized to lack of geographically s
         ensitive concepts to address sustainability transitions and environmental in
         novation processes. This has generated a number of suggestions how space, pl
         ace and scale can be better incorporated into transitions studies. Moreover,
          it has led to a quickly growing number of empirical studies that explicitly
          deal with geographical aspects of transition processes. This special issue
         takes stock of these recent developments by assembling a set of eight exempl
         ary papers that illustrate the added value of an explicitly geographical per
         spective on sustainability transitions. The contributions include a conceptu
         al paper, a literature review and six empirical papers that offer representa
         tive examples of recent work. Taken together, these contributions testify to
          the vitality of the emerging research on the geography of sustainability tr
         ansitions. This introduction to the special issue provides an overview of th
         e special issue and offers suggestions for future research.
' (1047 chars) serialnumber => protected'2210-4224' (9 chars) doi => protected'10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.004' (26 chars) uid => protected8226 (integer) _localizedUid => protected8226 (integer)modified _languageUid => protectedNULL _versionedUid => protected8226 (integer)modified pid => protected124 (integer)
5 => Snowflake\Publications\Domain\Model\Publicationprototypepersistent entity (uid=7477, pid=124) originalId => protected7477 (integer) authors => protected'Fuenfschilling,&nbsp;L.; Truffer,&nbsp;B.' (41 chars) title => protected'The structuration of socio-technical regimes - conceptual foundations from i
         nstitutional theory
' (95 chars) journal => protected'Research Policy' (15 chars) year => protected2014 (integer) volume => protected43 (integer) issue => protected'4' (1 chars) startpage => protected'772' (3 chars) otherpage => protected'791' (3 chars) categories => protected'sustainability transitions; multi-level perspective; socio-technical regime;
          institutionalization; institutional logics; Australian urban water sector
' (150 chars) description => protected'In recent years, socio-technical transitions literature has gained importanc
         e in addressing long-term, transformative change in various industries. In o
         rder to account for the inertia and path-dependency experienced in these sec
         tors, the concept of the socio-technical regime has been formulated. Socio-t
         echnical regimes denote the paradigmatic core of a sector, which results fro
         m the co-evolution of institutions and technologies over time. Despite its w
         idespread acceptance, the regime concept has repeatedly been criticized for
         lacking a clear operationalization. As a consequence, empirical applications
          tend to depict regimes as too 'monolithic' and 'homogenous', not adequately
          considering persistent institutional tensions and contradictions. These are
          however crucial for assessing transition dynamics. In this paper, we revisi
         t two concepts from institutional theory that enable an explicit identificat
         ion of socio-technical regimes and more generally a specification of the 'se
         mi-coherence' of socio-technical systems. First, we will show that 'levels o
         f structuration' can be conceptualized as degrees of institutionalization, t
         hereby treating institutionalization as a variable with different effects on
          actors, the stability of the system and thus the potential for change. Seco
         ndly, we draw on the institutional logics approach to characterize the conte
         nt of various structural elements present in a system and to trace conflicts
          and contradictions between them. We illustrate this approach with an empiri
         cal in-depth analysis of the transformation of the Australian urban water se
         ctor since the 1970ies.
' (1619 chars) serialnumber => protected'0048-7333' (9 chars) doi => protected'10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010' (28 chars) uid => protected7477 (integer) _localizedUid => protected7477 (integer)modified _languageUid => protectedNULL _versionedUid => protected7477 (integer)modified pid => protected124 (integer)
6 => Snowflake\Publications\Domain\Model\Publicationprototypepersistent entity (uid=6906, pid=124) originalId => protected6906 (integer) authors => protected'Dewald,&nbsp;U.; Truffer,&nbsp;B.' (33 chars) title => protected'The local sources of market formation: explaining regional growth differenti
         als in German photovoltaic markets
' (110 chars) journal => protected'European Planning Studies' (25 chars) year => protected2012 (integer) volume => protected20 (integer) issue => protected'3' (1 chars) startpage => protected'397' (3 chars) otherpage => protected'420' (3 chars) categories => protected'' (0 chars) description => protected'Sustainable transitions in the energy sector have gained only insufficient a
         ttention in economic geography so far. Conversely, transition scholars do no
         t pay sufficient attention to the spatial dimension of these dynamics. This
         paper introduces a conceptual framework for analysing the spatial characteri
         stics of market formation processes in emerging technological innovation sys
         tems, thus proposing a shared field of research for economic geographers and
          transition scholars. Drawing on a social constructivist analysis of market
         formation processes, we propose to differentiate "market formation" into thr
         ee sub-processes for which we additionally specify spatial characteristics:
         (1) the formation of market segments, (2) market transactions and (3) end-us
         er profiles. We apply this conceptual and explanatory framework to explain t
         he uneven geography of photovoltaic market formation in Germany, the current
          world market leader in this field. By analysing the role of local solar ini
         tiatives in shaping and supporting local market formation processes, we are
         able to provide a more encompassing explanation of the German PV success sto
         ry than alternative accounts that merely focus on strong incentive structure
         s and favourable geophysical conditions.
' (1256 chars) serialnumber => protected'0965-4313' (9 chars) doi => protected'10.1080/09654313.2012.651803' (28 chars) uid => protected6906 (integer) _localizedUid => protected6906 (integer)modified _languageUid => protectedNULL _versionedUid => protected6906 (integer)modified pid => protected124 (integer)
7 => Snowflake\Publications\Domain\Model\Publicationprototypepersistent entity (uid=6852, pid=124) originalId => protected6852 (integer) authors => protected'Truffer,&nbsp;B.; Coenen,&nbsp;L.' (33 chars) title => protected'Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies' (75 chars) journal => protected'Regional Studies' (16 chars) year => protected2012 (integer) volume => protected46 (integer) issue => protected'1' (1 chars) startpage => protected'1' (1 chars) otherpage => protected'21' (2 chars) categories => protected'sustainability; environmental innovations; geography of transitions' (67 chars) description => protected'Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies,
          <em>Regional Studies</em>. Sustainable development and environmental innova
         tions have received increasing attention in regional studies and the related
          literature. In how far sustainability concerns might also lead to fundament
         al transformations in technologies, industries and lifestyles (so-called sus
         tainability transitions) has, however, found much less resonance. Sustainabi
         lity transitions have been in the focus of scholars from the field of innova
         tion studies. However, until recently, these approaches mostly disregarded s
         patial aspects. This paper therefore maps out a field of future research –
          the geography of sustainability transitions – that might be beneficially
         laboured by both traditions. The paper introduces the core concepts, but als
         o the limitations of the transitions literature. After reviewing salient lin
         es of sustainability-related research in regional studies, the paper specifi
         es promising research areas at the interface between both fields. Empirical
         illustrations will be provided from recent work in sustainability transition
         s research venturing into this interface.
' (1181 chars) serialnumber => protected'0034-3404' (9 chars) doi => protected'10.1080/00343404.2012.646164' (28 chars) uid => protected6852 (integer) _localizedUid => protected6852 (integer)modified _languageUid => protectedNULL _versionedUid => protected6852 (integer)modified pid => protected124 (integer)
8 => Snowflake\Publications\Domain\Model\Publicationprototypepersistent entity (uid=6934, pid=124) originalId => protected6934 (integer) authors => protected'Markard,&nbsp;J.; Raven,&nbsp;R.; Truffer,&nbsp;B.' (50 chars) title => protected'Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects' (75 chars) journal => protected'Research Policy' (15 chars) year => protected2012 (integer) volume => protected41 (integer) issue => protected'6' (1 chars) startpage => protected'955' (3 chars) otherpage => protected'967' (3 chars) categories => protected'innovation studies; sustainability; literature review' (53 chars) description => protected'Sustainability oriented innovation and technology studies have received incr
         easing attention over the past 10–15 years. In particular, a new field dea
         ling with "sustainability transitions" has gained ground and reached an outp
         ut of 60–100 academic papers per year. In this article, we aim to identify
          the intellectual contours of this emerging field by conducting a review of
         basic conceptual frameworks, together with bibliographical analysis of 540 j
         ournal articles in the field. It is against this background that we position
          the six papers assembled in a special section in Research Policy. These pap
         ers pave the way for new conceptual developments and serve as stepping-stone
         s in the maturation of sustainability transition studies, by linking with th
         e scholarly literatures of management studies, sociology, policy studies, ec
         onomic geography, and modeling.
' (867 chars) serialnumber => protected'0048-7333' (9 chars) doi => protected'10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013' (28 chars) uid => protected6934 (integer) _localizedUid => protected6934 (integer)modified _languageUid => protectedNULL _versionedUid => protected6934 (integer)modified pid => protected124 (integer)
9 => Snowflake\Publications\Domain\Model\Publicationprototypepersistent entity (uid=6210, pid=124) originalId => protected6210 (integer) authors => protected'Störmer,&nbsp;E.; Truffer,&nbsp;B.; Dominguez,&nbsp;D.; Gujer,&nbsp;W.; Her
         lyn,&nbsp;A.; Hiessl,&nbsp;H.; Kastenholz,&nbsp;H.; Klinke,&nbsp;A.; Markard
         ,&nbsp;J.; Maurer,&nbsp;M.; Ruef,&nbsp;A.
' (193 chars) title => protected'The exploratory analysis of trade-offs in strategic planning: lessons from r
         egional infrastructure foresight
' (108 chars) journal => protected'Technological Forecasting and Social Change' (43 chars) year => protected2009 (integer) volume => protected76 (integer) issue => protected'9' (1 chars) startpage => protected'1150' (4 chars) otherpage => protected'1162' (4 chars) categories => protected'regional foresight; strategic planning; participation; infrastructure' (69 chars) description => protected'The sustainable transformation of infrastructure sectors represents a challe
         nge of prime importance worldwide. Due to long life times of infrastructures
         , strategic decision making has to explicitly consider uncertainties in cont
         ext conditions, value considerations and available technological alternative
         s. However currently, strategic infrastructure planning is often carried out
          in a very narrow perspective. The present paper argues that foresight infor
         med strategic planning, allows addressing trade-offs related to context unce
         rtainties, value conflicts and sustainability deficits in a structured way.
         The paper introduces a specific procedural proposal, the Regional Infrastruc
         ture Foresight method (RIF) and illustrates its potential virtues through an
          application to urban water management planning in a Swiss region (Kiesental
         ).
' (838 chars) serialnumber => protected'0040-1625' (9 chars) doi => protected'10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.008' (30 chars) uid => protected6210 (integer) _localizedUid => protected6210 (integer)modified _languageUid => protectedNULL _versionedUid => protected6210 (integer)modified pid => protected124 (integer)
Cherunya, P. C.; Ahlborg, H.; Truffer, B. (2020) Anchoring innovations in oscillating domestic spaces: why sanitation service offerings fail in informal settlements, Research Policy, 49(1), 103841 (16 pp.), doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103841, Institutional Repository
Boschma, R.; Coenen, L.; Frenken, K.; Truffer, B. (2017) Towards a theory of regional diversification: combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies, Regional Studies, 51(1), 31-45, doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460, Institutional Repository
Weber, K. M.; Truffer, B. (2017) Moving innovation systems research to the next level: towards an integrative agenda, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 101-121, doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx002, Institutional Repository
Binz, C.; Truffer, B. (2017) Global innovation systems - a conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts, Research Policy, 46(7), 1284-1298, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012, Institutional Repository
Truffer, B.; Murphy, J. T.; Raven, R. (2015) The geography of sustainability transitions: contours of an emerging theme, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 63-72, doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.004, Institutional Repository
Fuenfschilling, L.; Truffer, B. (2014) The structuration of socio-technical regimes - conceptual foundations from institutional theory, Research Policy, 43(4), 772-791, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010, Institutional Repository
Dewald, U.; Truffer, B. (2012) The local sources of market formation: explaining regional growth differentials in German photovoltaic markets, European Planning Studies, 20(3), 397-420, doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.651803, Institutional Repository
Truffer, B.; Coenen, L. (2012) Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies, Regional Studies, 46(1), 1-21, doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.646164, Institutional Repository
Markard, J.; Raven, R.; Truffer, B. (2012) Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects, Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013, Institutional Repository
Störmer, E.; Truffer, B.; Dominguez, D.; Gujer, W.; Herlyn, A.; Hiessl, H.; Kastenholz, H.; Klinke, A.; Markard, J.; Maurer, M.; Ruef, A. (2009) The exploratory analysis of trade-offs in strategic planning: lessons from regional infrastructure foresight, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(9), 1150-1162, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.008, Institutional Repository

Group Leader

Prof. Dr. Bernhard Truffer Group leader, Group Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 5670 Send Mail

Navigation

Current Projects

We are identifying the challenges of modular infrastructure systems for the Swiss economy and society using the example of urban water management.
An inter- and transdisciplinary strategic research program that strives to develop novel non-gridconnected water and sani- tation systems that can function as comparable alternatives to network-based systems.
We seek to understand how formal and informal institutions, planning procedures and resources drive or constrain informal settlements upgrading in Sub Saharan Africa cities.